From the ever-reliable wikipedia:
In Cummins v Bond, a psychic in a trance claimed to have written down what spirits told her, through a process of automatic writing. In court, she accepted that she was not the creative author of the writing. The creative input, had, presumably, come from the spirits. Nonetheless, the court held that she had exercised sufficient labour and skill in transcribing what the spirits had told her, and translating it, that she had a copyright in the literary work which resulted.
1 comment:
But was the work any good? She could have felt quite cheated if she was accessed by a hack writer, rather than Shakespeare's shade.
Post a Comment